Skip to content
Named in Gartner's 2026 COST category

Continuous Offensive Security Testing (COST) that fires on every change.

FireCompass runs trigger-driven web and API pentests the moment you deploy, expose a new asset, or a fresh CVE drops. Every finding ships with a working exploit. Under 2% false positives.

30+ analyst recognitions 100% on XBEN, Acuart & DVWA Fortune 500 customers
The definition

What is Continuous Offensive Security Testing?

Continuous Offensive Security Testing (COST) is a trigger-driven model that replaces annual, calendar-based pentesting with offensive testing that starts when something material changes: a deployment, a new asset, a fresh CVE, or configuration drift. It unifies discovery, penetration testing, attack-chain validation, and red teaming into one continuously operating capability.

Gartner named the category in "The Future of Pen Testing Is Continuous Offensive Security Testing" (March 2026, ID G00845606).
Why now

Annual pentesting was built for software that shipped once a quarter.

That world is gone. Teams deploy weekly or daily, and attackers now move at machine speed. Three structural gaps open the moment testing runs on a calendar.

Scope gap
20%

Tested vs attacked

Most programs test crown-jewel apps and leave shadow apps, forgotten subdomains, and API endpoints untouched. Attackers probe 100% of the surface.

Depth gap
up to 70%

Scanner false positives

Scanners flag issues in isolation. Real attackers chain them. 22% of breaches start with credential abuse, and 20% begin through a peripheral asset.

Speed gap
365d

vs a 3-day exploit window

Many teams still test once a year. Attackers exploit new CVEs in about 3 days. The gap widens with every release you ship.

Gartner predicts that by 2028, more than 60% of enterprise pentest programs will run as continuous validation embedded in DevSecOps, replacing annual assessments as the primary proof of resilience.
How FireCompass delivers COST

Four capabilities, each tied to a trigger.

A change happens, a test fires. No scheduling, no human in the critical path.

01 · Closes the Scope gap

Discover the surface attackers actually see

Build your real attack surface from your name alone, so testing covers what attackers can actually reach.

  • Shadow apps and forgotten subdomains surfaced from your name alone.
  • Leaked credentials on the deep and dark web.
  • API endpoints pulled from JS files and traffic.
  • Visibility scales from about 20% to over 99% of the surface.
Trigger: a new asset or subdomain appears
FireCompass attack surface discovery across apps, APIs and shadow IT
02 · Closes the Depth gap

Pentest with proof, not noise

Agents test like an attacker and confirm what is real, so your team triages exploitable findings, not false alarms.

  • OWASP Top 10: 2025 plus business logic testing.
  • Authenticated and unauthenticated paths, including MFA flows.
  • Credential abuse and authorization testing.
  • Every finding ships proof of exploit, steps to reproduce, and ready-to-run Python.
Trigger: a deployment or a fresh CVE
FireCompass automated web and API penetration testing with proof of exploit
03 · Closes the Depth gap

Chain findings into real attack paths

A single finding is rarely the breach. Agents connect findings the way real adversaries do in multi-stage red teaming, showing true blast radius.

  • Credential reuse across services.
  • App-to-app and app-to-network lateral movement.
  • Privilege escalation path discovery.
  • Full MITRE ATT&CK kill-chain automation, no human steering.
Trigger: a confirmed, exploitable finding
FireCompass multi-stage red teaming and attack-path chaining
04 · Closes the Speed gap

Run on your cadence, not a calendar

Testing keeps pace with how fast you ship, so the window between a change and its validation closes to near zero.

  • Weekly, on demand, or aligned to CI/CD.
  • Day-1 CVE validation for new disclosures.
  • One-click revalidation to confirm fixes.
  • Agentless and operational in minutes.
Trigger: your release cadence
Code push New asset New CVE On demand FIRECOMPASS A test every day, on every trigger LEGACY PENTEST One test Then blind for ~365 days
See it on your surface

Run COST against your own attack surface.

Start free, or connect with a FireCompass expert. In one session you will:

  • See shadow apps, subdomains, and exposed APIs discovered from your name alone.
  • Watch an agent validate a real finding with a working proof-of-concept exploit.
  • Set the triggers that fire a test on every deploy, new asset, and fresh CVE.
Free AI Pen Test
Proof, not adjectives

Exploit-validated findings, benchmarked in the open.

100%
XBEN 104/104, Acuart 12/12, DVWA
<2%
False positives vs up to 70% for scanners
10x
Faster: 1 day vs 14+ days lead time
11x
Cheaper: >$1,000 vs $2,400–$10,000/app

One finding became a full compromise

  • Exposed .git. The agent reconstructed the repo and pulled database credentials from config files.
  • Direct DB access blocked. The port was not externally exposed. A scanner stops here.
  • Credential reuse to SSH root. The agent tested the same creds against SSH and gained root.
  • Internal pivot to data exfiltration. From the server it found private keys, pivoted, and dumped the database.
  • No human steering. No predefined playbook. Agents beat our top researchers 60 to 70% of the time in internal evals.

Fortune 500: annual program to continuous

Before → After
Cost per app~$5,000 (manual)
Lead time2+ weeks
Coverage200 of 2,000 apps
Cost per appUnder $1,000
Lead time1 day
CoverageNear-full surface
COST vs the alternatives

Most "continuous" platforms solve one gap and ignore the other two.

Continuous DAST gives speed without depth. PTaaS gives depth without scope or cadence. ASM gives scope without validation. COST demands all three at once.

CapabilityContinuous DASTHuman-led PTaaSContinuous ASMPoint-and-shoot AIFireCompass
Full attack-surface scopePartialScoped sliceYesSingle targetYes
Business-logic depthNoManualNoLimitedAI-driven
Multi-stage attack chainsNoManualNoSingle-shotAutonomous
Exploit-validated PoCNoYesNoYesEvery finding
Trigger-driven cadenceYesWeeksYesManualOn every change
Cost per app$1,460–$2,900$2,400–$10,000LowVaries$450–$2,500
False positive rateup to 70%VariableHighVariableUnder 2%
Governance & audit trailPartialManualPartialLimitedBuilt in
Governance & safety

Continuous only works if it is safe to run in production.

Gartner says the governance layer is the part the market underestimates most. It is where we built first.

  • Scope enforcement. Agents act only within defined boundaries. Nothing tests outside the authorized surface.
  • Production-safe execution. Rate limits and control gates keep live systems stable while testing runs.
  • Forensic audit trail. Every command, request, and response is timestamped for non-repudiation and review.
  • Human-in-the-loop, optional. Run fully autonomous, or keep an expert validating before action.
  • Kill switches. Stop any engagement instantly. Control over what agents can and cannot do is the design principle.
Backed by the industry

Validated by the analysts who define the category.

Gartner
Named in the 2026 COST category

Listed in "The Future of Pen Testing Is Continuous Offensive Security Testing" (ID G00845606).

Benchmarks
100% · under 2% FPR

XBEN 104/104, Acuart 12/12 PoC-validated, and DVWA, fully autonomous with no human hints.

Recognition
30+ analyst reports

Across Gartner, Forrester, IDC, and GigaOm. GigaOm Leader, 2023. On the Hype Cycle four cycles running.

Bruce Schneier, advisor. Trusted by Fortune 1000 enterprises.
Questions security teams ask

COST, answered.

What is Continuous Offensive Security Testing (COST)?
COST is a trigger-driven model that replaces annual pentesting with offensive testing that starts when something material changes: a deployment, a new asset, a fresh CVE, or configuration drift. Gartner named the category in March 2026. It unifies discovery, penetration testing, attack-chain validation, and red teaming into one continuously operating capability.
How is COST different from annual penetration testing?
Annual testing covers about 20% of the surface once a year and reports findings in isolation. COST tests the full surface on every change, chains findings into real attack paths, and proves exploitability with a working PoC. Attackers exploit new CVEs in about 3 days, so a 365-day cadence leaves the window open most of the year.
How does COST relate to CTEM?
CTEM is the program that scopes, discovers, prioritizes, validates, and mobilizes exposure reduction. COST is the offensive validation engine inside it. CTEM tells you what to worry about. COST proves whether an attacker could actually exploit it, and fires that proof whenever the environment changes.
Is continuous offensive testing safe to run in production?
Yes, when governance comes first. FireCompass enforces scope, executes within rate limits and control gates, and logs every request and response for a forensic audit trail. You can run fully autonomous or keep a human in the loop, and a kill switch stops any engagement instantly.
How fast does a test run, and what does it cost?
Tests launch in about 3 minutes with no install and return results in roughly a day, against 2 or more weeks for a manual engagement. Cost runs $450 to $2,500 per app, compared with $2,400 to $10,000 for manual testing. That is the economics that make testing on every change possible.
What does FireCompass test?
Web applications, APIs, and infrastructure, internal and external. Coverage is aligned to OWASP Top 10: 2025 and includes business logic, authenticated and unauthenticated paths, credential abuse, and multi-stage chains. Benchmarks: 100% on XBEN (104/104), Acuart (12/12, PoC-validated), and DVWA, at under 2% false positives.
Hack Yourself Before AI Does.

Run your first trigger-driven web and API pentest this week. No install, results in about a day.

Free AI Pen Test